Cases 31 - 40 of 350
Miao v. Karp et al
as 1:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
Rong Miao
Defendant:
Alexander C. Karp, David Glazer, Shyam Sankar and others
Nominal Defendant:
Palantir Technologies, Inc.
Intervenor:
Mikhail Kuperman
AQW Holdings Inc. v. Pecorella
as 1:2023cv00057
Plaintiff:
AQW Holdings Inc.
Defendant:
Peter Pecorella
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Schwartz v. Latch, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Scott Schwartz
Defendant:
Latch, Inc., Luke Schoenfelder, Robert J. Speyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Happle v. Sweeney et al
as 1:2022cv01612
Plaintiff:
Thomas Martin-Happle and Thomas-Martin Happle
Defendant:
Michael Sweeney, Jack McNiff, Paul Margiotta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Johnson v. Forma Therapeutics Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01275
Plaintiff:
William Johnson
Defendant:
Forma Therapeutics Holdings, Inc., Peter Wirth, Frank D. Lee and others
Sebagh v. Paucek et al
as 1:2022cv01205
Plaintiff:
Daniel Sebagh
Defendant:
Christopher J. Paucek, Mark J. Chernis, Harsha Mokkarala and others
Nominal Defendant:
2U, Inc.
Weaver v. Moen et al
as 1:2022cv01063
Plaintiff:
Jack Weaver
Defendant:
Brent Moen, William Burke, Peter Soderberg and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Morgan v. ManTech International Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv01049
Plaintiff:
Anthony Morgan
Defendant:
ManTech International Corporation, Kevin M. Phillips, Richard L. Armitage and others
Chow v. Canyon Bridge Capital Management, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00947
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Bin Chow
Defendant:
Canyon Bridge Capital Management, LLC, Hong John Kao, Heber Raymond Bingham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Adams et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00847
Plaintiff:
Christina Adams, Peter Eldridge, Jonathan Fessenden and others
Defendant:
Michael Brewer and Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
