Cases 31 - 40 of 59
Richardson v. Hill
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2010cv03180
Petitioner:
John Mitchell Richardson
Respondent:
R. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robison v. Hill et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2010cv02954
Plaintiff:
Glen W. Robison
Defendant:
R. Hill, Paramvir Sahota and Moon Jeu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shank v. Hill
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2010cv01803
Petitioner:
Richard Shank
Respondent:
R. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gary v. Hill
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2010cv01761
Petitioner:
Glenn W. Gary
Respondent:
R. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Barboza v. Hill
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2010cv01769
Petitioner:
Antonio Barboza, Jr.
Respondent:
R. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hill v. Lewis
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2010cv01413
Petitioner:
Seneka R. Hill
Respondent:
G D Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wickerware v. Hill
as 4:2010cv01690
Petitioner:
Melvin Wickerware
Respondent:
R. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bell v. Hill et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2010cv00850
Plaintiff:
Danny Bell
Defendant:
R. Hill, B. Haythorne and S. Etlin, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.