Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Smith v. Depuy, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv03091
Defendant:
Depuy, Inc. , DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Thaler
as 3:2011cv00453
Petitioner:
Michael Robert Smith
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00808
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith, Jr. et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2011cv01757
Plaintiff:
Robert Smith, Jr. and Veronica Smith
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, DePuy Inc., Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00596
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2010cv00087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Farr et al v. Green et al
as 3:2010cv00225
Plaintiff:
Leah Farr, Leah Farr, Leah Farr and others
Defendant:
Jason Green, Grady Layfield, Hank Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Smith et al v. Coil Tubing Services, L.L.C. et al
as 4:2009cv03351
Plaintiff:
Robert Smith, Adam Crews, Donald Woodard and others
Defendant:
Coil Tubing Services, L.L.C., Smith International Inc., Houston Frazier and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Smith v. Quarterman
as 5:2009cv00190
Petitioner:
Robert Smith
Respondent:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. De La Cruz et al
as 3:2008cv00241
Plaintiff:
Robert Smith
Defendant:
De La Cruz, Jr, ABL Management and Gean Leonard
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
