Cases 31 - 40 of 116
Kugler v. Scott et al
as 4:2017cv04278
Plaintiff:
Devin Kugler
Defendant:
Gregg Scott, Chris Clayton, Joseph Hankins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burberry Limited, a United Kingdom company et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2017cv07171
Plaintiff:
Burberry Limited, a United Kingdom company and Burberry Limited, a New York corporation
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", zheng ru ping, zou yulan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv06226
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Beckel et al v. Scott et al
as 4:2017cv04247
Plaintiff:
Andrew W Beckel and Allen M Barnard
Defendant:
Gregg Scott, Erik Kunkle, C Clayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coombs v. The Roth Morgan Firm Corp. et al
as 1:2017cv06141
Plaintiff:
Winston Coombs
Defendant:
The Roth Morgan Firm Corp., Andrew Marrero, David Shapiro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roth v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv50196
Plaintiff:
Sydney H. Roth
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Pegues v. Kulhan et al
as 4:2017cv04161
Plaintiff:
Walter Pegues
Defendant:
Gary Kulhan, James Clayton, Judy Roth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03720
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Midland IRA Inc. FBO Arthur Wulf Roth IRA v. Sack Lunch Productions, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv03165
Plaintiff:
Midland IRA Inc. FBO Arthur Wulf Roth IRA
Defendant:
Sack Lunch Productions, Inc. and Richard Surber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02482
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
