Cases 31 - 40 of 7,666
Javier Pellecer v. S. Smith
as 2:2024cv04067
Petitioner:
Javier Pellecer
Respondent:
S. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00996
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00997
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00995
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Wilson et al v. CIty of Antioch et al
as 3:2024cv02758
Plaintiff:
Jessie Wilson and Dajon Smith
Defendant:
CIty of Antioch, Devon Christopher Wenger, Eric Allen Rombough and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Smith v. State of California
as 5:2024cv02761
Plaintiff:
Leslie Rosalee Smith
Defendant:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Angel et al
as 3:2024cv02723
Plaintiff:
Jude David Smith
Defendant:
Bobbie Angel, Frank Angel, Marilyn Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Smith v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02707
Plaintiff:
Brianna Smith
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Ayodale et al
as 1:2024cv00538
Plaintiff:
Candace Smith
Defendant:
Mercy Ayodale, Monica Carew and Uyi Igbinoson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dwayne Amsterdam v. Martica Rochelle Smith
as 5:2024cv00947
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Amsterdam
Defendant:
Martica Rochelle Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
