Cases 31 - 40 of 104
USA v. Driscoll III, et al
as 1:2016cv00071
Defendant:
James H. Driscoll, III, Mary Jo Driscoll, William J. Henderson, Sr. and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company v. Schenck et al
as 1:2015cv00553
Plaintiff:
The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company
Defendant:
James W. Schenck, Sr., James W. Schenck, Jr., Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
U.S. Bank National Association v. Bourque, Sr. et al
as 1:2015cv00478
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Defendant:
Alfred E. Bourque, Sr., Steven H. Bourque, Gary E. Bourque and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Snead v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage
as 1:2015cv00280
Plaintiff:
Gregory W. Snead, Sr.
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sweet Jr. et al v. Thomas III et al
as 1:2015cv00259
Plaintiff:
Kevin E. Sweet Jr. and Kevin E. Sweet Sr.
Defendant:
Anthony Thomas III, Anthony Thomas Jr., T & E Investments, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Staley Sr. v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv00202
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L Staley Sr.
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Haworth v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv00304
Plaintiff:
Carlton D. Haworth, Sr.
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Sweet Jr. et al v. Thomas III et al
as 1:2014cv00143
Plaintiff:
Kevin E. Sweet Jr. and Kevin E. Sweet Sr.
Defendant:
Anthony Thomas III , Chaim Pizem and T & E Investments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Coccoli, Sr. v. FREDAP, Inc.
as 1:2013cv00630
Plaintiff:
Vincent R. Coccoli, Sr.
Defendant:
FREDAP, Inc. and Alfred Daprato
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown, Sr. v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA
as 1:2013cv00172
Plaintiff:
David P. Brown, Sr.
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
