Cases 31 - 40 of 376
Clark v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 3:2023cv00412
Plaintiff:
Santana Clark
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANTANA v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv07925
Plaintiff:
JORGE J SANTANA, II
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Santana et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv19704
Plaintiff:
Nelson Santana and Gloria Santana
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Gil v. Morales et al
as 1:2023cv21007
Plaintiff:
Roberto Gil
Defendant:
Rachel Morales, Jonathan Santana, Robert Macku and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. DIXON et al
as 4:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
JODY M JOHNSON
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON, THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR SUWANEE COUNTY, L SANTANA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Clark v. Suwannee Correctional Institution
as 3:2023cv00241
Plaintiff:
Santana Clark
Defendant:
Suwannee Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Suwannee Correctional Institution
as 3:2023cv00214
Plaintiff:
Santana Clark
Defendant:
Suwannee Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REAL-SANTANA v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
JOSE REAL-SANTANA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
SANTANA v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv25032
Plaintiff:
ROBIN A SANTANA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Santana v. National Specialty Insurance Company
as 1:2022cv23868
Plaintiff:
Ines Santana
Defendant:
National Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
