Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2014cv61972
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
SAMPSON et al v. CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS et al
as 1:2013cv24312
Plaintiff:
EARL SAMPSON , TOREE M DANIELS , ANTHONY LOWERY and others
Defendant:
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS , OLIVER G GILBERT, III , SHIRLEY GIBSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beverly v. TD Bank, N.A.
as 0:2013cv60176
Plaintiff:
Don Beverly , Marmarser Investment LLC, Caro Group LLC and others
Defendant:
TD Bank, N.A. , Scott W. Rothstein, Frank A Spinosa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Schaeffer v. Dalmar Roofing Industries, Inc. et al
as 6:2013cv00074
Plaintiff:
Timothy Schaeffer
Defendant:
Dalmar Roofing Industries, Inc. and Dale E. Martin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00652
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00619
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Southeast Publications U.S.A., Inc. v. Texas Advertising, Inc., et al
as 0:2012cv62016
Plaintiff:
Southeast Publications U.S.A., Inc.
Defendant:
Texas Advertising, Inc. and Brian Schaeffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012bk00006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv24523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012bk00007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
