Cases 31 - 40 of 57
GIBBS-SQUIRES v. COSBY et al
as 2:2016cv00768
Plaintiff:
M. EUGENE GIBBS-SQUIRES
Defendant:
WILLIAM HENRY (BILL) COSBY, SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: BOARD OF REGENTS, SOUTH CAROLINA SUPREME COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lopez v. National Museum of the American Indian et al
as 1:2015cv09695
Plaintiff:
Dory Lopez
Defendant:
National Museum of the American Indian and Smithsonian Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
GRYDER v. VIRGINIA EMPLOYMENT COMMISSION et al
as 1:2014cv02142
Plaintiff:
KEN GRYDER
Defendant:
VIRGINIA EMPLOYMENT COMMISSION, RANDY BENDER , VINCE STROHMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01900
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
SIMMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2013cv01158
Plaintiff:
INGRID SIMMS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, NATIONAL PARK SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-5193
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
EDEN v. SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION et al
as 1:2012cv01739
Defendant:
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
BARBARA EDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Harris v. United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv00281
Plaintiff:
Margaret Bowland Harris
Defendant:
National Portrait Gallery, Smithsonian Institution and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
