Cases 31 - 40 of 44
TINKHAM v. SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P.
as 2:2011cv00591
Plaintiff:
JULIE TINKHAM
Defendant:
SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
KAHN V. SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv06420
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN KAHN
Defendant:
SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION and SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KIM et al v. SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv06334
Plaintiff:
ELBERT KIM and WENDY POLOS
Defendant:
SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION and SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv03696
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EOFF v. SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv01190
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER EOFF
Defendant:
SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION and SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
DAVID PEYSER SPORTSWEAR, INC. et al v. SPECTRUM BRANDS INC. et al
as 2:2010cv01080
Plaintiff:
DAVID PEYSER SPORTSWEAR, INC. and NATIONAL LIABILITY AND FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
SPECTRUM BRANDS INC., JOHN DOE and JOHN DOE II
Movant:
DHL GLOBAL FORWARDING
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
CHEROWITZO v. GLOBAL SPECTRUM LP
as 3:2010cv00905
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY CHEROWITZO
Defendant:
GLOBAL SPECTRUM LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P. et al v. THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE BOROUGH OF PARAMUS, NEW JERSEY
as 2:2009cv04940
Plaintiff:
SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P. and T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC
Defendant:
THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE BOROUGH OF PARAMUS, NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv05619
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv05130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
