Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Sevy v. BP PLC, et al
as 1:2013cv03587
Plaintiff:
Michael Sevy
Defendant:
BP PLC,, Royal Sutch Shell PLC,, Statoil ASA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Sevy v. BP PLC, et al
as NYS/1:13-cv-03587
Plaintiff:
Michael Sevy
Defendant:
BP PLC, , Royal Sutch Shell PLC, , Statoil ASA and others
Harter v. BP PLC et al
as LAM/3:13-cv-00337
Plaintiff:
David Harter
Defendant:
BP P.L.C. , Royal Shell,PLC , Statoil, ASA and others
Harter v. BP PLC et al
as 3:2013cv00337
Defendant:
BP P.L.C., John Doe 12, John Doe 13 and others
Plaintiff:
David Harter
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
HARTER v. BP PLC et al
as 3:2013cv00336
Defendant:
BP PLC, ROYAL DUTCH SHELL,PLC and STATOIL, ASA
Plaintiff:
MR DAVID HARTER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Prime International Trading, Ltd. v. BP Plc et al
as 7:2013cv03473
Plaintiff:
Prime International Trading, Ltd.
Defendant:
BP Plc, Royal Dutch Shell Plc, Statoil ASA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Prime International Trading, Ltd. v. BP Plc et al
as NYS/1:13-cv-03473
Plaintiff:
Prime International Trading, Ltd.
Defendant:
BP Plc , Royal Dutch Shell Plc , Statoil ASA and others
Prime International Trading, Ltd. v. BP Plc et al
as 1:2013cv03473
Plaintiff:
Prime International Trading, Ltd.
Defendant:
BP Plc, Royal Dutch Shell Plc, Statoil ASA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Thompson v. Brigham et al
as 1:2011cv00970
Defendant:
Ben M. Brigham, David T. Brigham, Brigham Exploration Company and others
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Hoppe v. Brigham et al
as 1:2011cv00966
Defendant:
Ben M. Brigham, David T. Brigham, Brigham Exploration Company and others
Plaintiff:
Charles T. Hoppe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
