Cases 31 - 40 of 41
BIFFLE v. UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv69509
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S BIFFLE
Defendant:
UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, AMERICAN PREMIER INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION v. SUNOCO, INC. (R&M)
as 2:2008mc00145
Plaintiff:
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Respondent:
SUNOCO, INC. (R&M)
Cause Of Action: Local Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv03324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
KEMBLESVILLE HHMO CENTER, LLC et al v. LANDHOPE REALTY COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv02405
Plaintiff:
KEMBLESVILLE HHMO CENTER, LLC, KEMBLESVILLE HHMO CENTER, LLC, LARRY ELLER and others
Defendant:
LANDHOPE REALTY COMPANY, W.B. DIXON STROUD, JR., MNAN ENTERPRISES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SUNOCO, INC. (R & M) v. MARSHALL
as 2:2007cv04858
Plaintiff:
SUNOCO, INC. (R & M)
Defendant:
GREGORY MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv02960
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv02235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MILLER v. SUNOCO, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv01456
Plaintiff:
JACOB MILLER and JACOB MILLER
Defendant:
SUNOCO, INC., SUNOCO, INC., EAST GATE SUNOCO and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
