Cases 31 - 40 of 171
Hardin v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00034
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Suzanne H. Hardin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv05123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04558
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
DIXON et al v. CHEVRON USA INC et al
as 4:2018cv00141
Defendant:
Whatley Oil and Auto Parts Company, Chevron USA, Inc. and CHEVRON USA INC
Plaintiff:
Suzanne C. Dixon and Jerry Carroll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Goodemote v. Load Express LLC et al
as 4:2018cv00161
Defendant:
Faisal Ali Shegow and Load Express LLC
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Goodemote
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Delaar et al v. Carolina Crown, Inc.
as 1:2018cv03022
Plaintiff:
Halie Delaar and Suzanne Biller
Defendant:
Carolina Crown, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Diego Cervantes v. Invesco Holding Company (US), Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv02551
Plaintiff:
Diego Cervantes
Defendant:
Invesco Holding Company (US), Inc. , Invesco Ltd. , Invesco National Trust Company and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Sheppard v. Regency Hills Community Association, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01955
Plaintiff:
Marilynn Sheppard
Defendant:
Regency Hills Community Association, Inc. , Community Management Associates, Inc. , Sheryl Gripper and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Katiushka Rebeca Acosta-Smith et al v. Equifax Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01467
Plaintiff:
Katiushka Rebeca Acosta-Smith, Rebekah Leann Anderson, James Andrews and others
Defendant:
Equifax Inc and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Price v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00537
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Price
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
