Cases 31 - 40 of 602
Crump v. Social Security
as 7:2013cv00007
Plaintiff:
Janet M. Crump
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Defendant:
Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jones v. Astrue
as 5:2013cv00002
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
John Paul Jones
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Herron v. Astrue
as 2:2013cv00001
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Johnny Herron
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Pittman v. Astrue
as 5:2013cv00001
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Jennifer B. Pittman
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Dameron v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv00064
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Dameron
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hicks v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv00618
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Candace Joy Hicks
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lundblad v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv00096
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Deborah A Lundblad
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Wade v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv00621
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Peggy Wade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Wallace v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv00054
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Twilla Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Johnston v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv00617
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Melissa J. Johnston
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
