Cases 31 - 40 of 1,438
McNeil v. Molnar, et al.
as 24-2733
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MCNEIL
Defendant:
DAVE MOLNAR, Investigator General, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, WILLIAM GLASS, Sergeant and others
Alvarez v. Wolfson et al
as 3:2024cv00162
Petitioner:
Leo Lionel Alvarez
Respondent:
Steve B. Wolfson and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzales v. Gittere et al
as 2:2024cv00816
Petitioner:
Raul Gonzales
Respondent:
Warden William Gittere and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blockson v. Oliver
as 2:2024cv00809
Petitioner:
Christopher Leonard Blockson
Respondent:
Ronald Oliver and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mahmoud v. Williams, et al.
as 24-2623
Petitioner:
MOHAMED ABDALLA MAHMOUD
Respondent:
BRIAN WILLIAMS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Brooks v. District Attorney Joshua Judd
as 2:2024cv00679
Petitioner:
Michael Brooks
Respondent:
District Attorney Joshua Judd and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fergason v. Johnson, et al.
as 24-2233
Petitioner:
BRYAN MICHAEL FERGASON
Respondent:
CALVIN JOHNSON, CHARLES DANIELS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Leibel v. Reubart, et al.
as 24-2212
Petitioner:
TATIANA LEIBEL
Respondent:
REUBART, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Moran v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2024cv00123
Petitioner:
Julio Cesar Moran, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Nevada and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Palmer v. Garrett, et al.
as 24-2175
Petitioner:
MARKIECE PALMER
Respondent:
TIM GARRETT and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
