Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Phillips et al v. Option One Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv00306
Plaintiff:
Thomas H. Phillips and Tammy L. Phillips
Defendant:
Option One Mortgage Corporation , Sand Canyon Corporation , American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Henderson v. Holiday CVS, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2011cv00541
Plaintiff:
Kristy Henderson , Wesley Gorman , Debora Williams and others
Defendant:
Holiday CVS, L.L.C. , CVS Caremark, Corporation and CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Mediator:
Karen Evans
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Alexander et al v. Davol Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv03609
Plaintiff:
Tammy Alexander and Leroy Alexander
Defendant:
DAVOL INC. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Macari v. Astrue
as 1:2011cv00109
Plaintiff:
Tammy A. Macari
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Howard v. Astrue
as 1:2010cv00031
Plaintiff:
Tammy Howard
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00020
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
Haas v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv02936
Plaintiff:
Tammy Haas and Tammy Haas
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Beaudreault v. ADF, Inc.
as 1:2009cv00065
Plaintiff:
Tammy Beaudreault
Defendant:
ADF, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Healey v. Davol Inc et al
as 1:2009cv02742
Plaintiff:
Tammie D Healey, Tammie D Healey and Tammie D Healey
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C R Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Healey v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00544
Plaintiff:
Tammie D. Healey, Tammie D. Healey, Tammie D. Healey and others
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
