Cases 31 - 40 of 75
BRN CORP. et al v. COCHRAN
as 1:2017cv00247
Plaintiff:
BRN CORP. and METRO WEST REHAB. CORP.
Defendant:
NORRIS COCHRAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
BYRD-SANDERS v. METRO
as 1:2017cv00210
Plaintiff:
DONETTA MICHELLE BYRD-SANDERS
Defendant:
METRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ST. HELENA HOSPITAL et al v. BURWELL
as 1:2017cv00039
Plaintiff:
ST. HELENA HOSPITAL , WHITE MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER , HANFORD COMMUNITY HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. D.C. METRO TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2016cv01721
Plaintiff:
WILBUR JOHNSON
Defendant:
D.C. METRO TRANSIT AUTHORITY and SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTE ARCHIVES MUSEUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
ST. HELENA HOSPITAL et al v. BURWELL
as 1:2016cv00030
Plaintiff:
ST. HELENA HOSPITAL , WHITE MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER , HANFORD COMMUNITY HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
SYLVIA M. BURWELL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
STRITTMATTER METRO, LLC v. FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND et al
as 1:2015cv02114
Plaintiff:
STRITTMATTER METRO, LLC
Defendant:
FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND and ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BROWN v. WMATA, METRO TRANSIT POLICE et al
as 1:2015cv01409
Plaintiff:
JEROME BAY BROTHER JULIUS BROWN
Defendant:
WMATA, METRO TRANSIT POLICE, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and JAMES M. COLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
GEBRESALASSIE et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2015cv00762
Plaintiff:
ADDIS GEBRESALASSIE , EARTHA CLARK , MOHAMUD SAMANTAR and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
