Cases 31 - 40 of 55
ORTIZ v. US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2012cv01674
Plaintiff:
HERARDO ORTIZ
Defendant:
US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01578
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
BELT v. US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2012cv01202
Plaintiff:
TARIQ L. BELT
Defendant:
US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF US ATTORNEYS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
HAWKINS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2011cv01939
Plaintiff:
LEVI MCRAE LUGINBYHL HAWKINS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, CLAIRE V. EAGEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KISSI v. US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2011cv00829
Plaintiff:
DAVID KISSI
Defendant:
US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
JUDICAL WATCH, INC. v. US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2010cv01606
Plaintiff:
JUDICAL WATCH, INC.
Defendant:
US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
ASEMANI v. US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2010cv01548
Plaintiff:
BILLY G. ASEMANI
Defendant:
US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JUDD v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2010cv01547
Petitioner:
KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Respondent:
ERIC HOLDER, HARELY G. LAPPIN, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
CONCEPCION v. US CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION DIVISION et al
as 1:2010cv00599
Plaintiff:
ALBERTO CONCEPCION
Defendant:
US CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION DIVISION and US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
