Cases 31 - 40 of 517
Thomas v. Hayden
as 5:2022cv03233
Plaintiff:
Nicholas D'Andre Thomas
Defendant:
Ryan Hayden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cyr v. Rodriguez et al
as 6:2022cv01209
Plaintiff:
Cassidy Cyr
Defendant:
Michael Thomas Rodriguez, Penske Truck Leasing Corporation and United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Puetz v. Pryor et al
as 6:2022cv01191
Plaintiff:
Melissa Puetz
Defendant:
Thomas Pryor and Sheryl Pryor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Thomas v. Hayden
as 5:2022cv03172
Plaintiff:
Nicholas D'Andre Thomas
Defendant:
Ryan Hayden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas (ID 80566) v. Cheeks
as 5:2022cv03150
Petitioner:
Matthew R. Thomas
Respondent:
Chandler Cheeks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thomas v. Hayden
as 5:2022cv03143
Plaintiff:
Nicholas D'Andre Thomas
Defendant:
Ryan Hayden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Lee
as 5:2022cv03136
Plaintiff:
Nicholas D'Andre Thomas
Defendant:
Bethany Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashenfelter et al v. Escott Aerial Spraying, L.L.C. et al
as 6:2022cv01144
Plaintiff:
Lora Bennet, Lisa Braun, Jason Braun and others
Defendant:
Escott Aerial Spraying L.L.C., Andy Deterding, Tri-County Sprayers, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Torts to Land
Thomas v. West et al
as 5:2022cv03133
Plaintiff:
Nicholas D'Andre Thomas
Defendant:
Gary C. West, Kansas, State of and Office of the Disciplinary Administrator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
