Cases 31 - 40 of 2,496
MURZIKE v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2024cv00197
Defendant:
JAMES T. MURZIKE, D ELLIS, T THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURZIKE v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
R QUINN, W GIELOW, J SANTIAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21688
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Thompson v. Sulzbacher Behavioral Health
as 3:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
James E. Thompson
Defendant:
I.M. Sulzbacher Center for the Homeless and Sulzbacher Behavioral Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Patten v. Thompson et al
as 0:2024cv60676
Plaintiff:
Barrington Roderick Patten
Defendant:
Stevie Tyrone Thompson, Harry James Robinson, II, Lamont James Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Thompson v. Carnival Corporation
as 1:2024cv21514
Plaintiff:
Brad Thompson
Defendant:
Carnival Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Thompson v. Carnival Corporation
as 1:2024cv21515
Plaintiff:
Brad Thompson
Defendant:
Carnival Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
THOMPSON v. CENTURION OF FLORIDA LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
MELVIN BERNARD THOMPSON
Defendant:
CENTURION OF FLORIDA LLC, JASON THOMAS BRENES CATINCHI and JAQUELINE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson et al v. SouthState Bank, N.A.
as 8:2024cv00859
Plaintiff:
Henry Thompson and George Vargha
Defendant:
SouthState Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
