Cases 31 - 39 of 39
David Leyland v. Miller Edward
as 11-5179
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David John Leyland
Defendant - Appellee:
Miller Edwards, United States Park Police Property Office
Robert Matthews v. Department of the Interior, et al
as 10-1394
Petitioner:
Robert R. Matthews
Respondent:
United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service and United States Park Police
Robert Matthews v. Department of the Interior, et al
as 10-5335
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert R. Matthews
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service and United States Park Police
MATTHEWS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR et al
as 1:2010cv01661
Plaintiff:
ROBEERT R. MATTHEWS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, NATIONAL PARK SERVICE and UNITED STATES PARK POLICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ESTATE OF TREY JOYNER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2010cv01500
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF TREY JOYNER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES PARK POLICE, UNKOWN OFFICERS OF THE US PARK POLICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seda v. United States Department of the Interior et al
as 1:2010cv02514
Defendant:
Gateway National Recreation Area, National Park Service, United States Department of the Interior and others
Plaintiff:
Juanita Seda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
WILSON v. UNITED STATES PARK POLICE
as 1:2009cv00526
Plaintiff:
DEREK WILSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PARK POLICE
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Wasserman, Michael v. Rodacker, Denise, et al
as 07-5307
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael F. Wasserman
Defendant - Appellee:
Denise Rodacker, United States Park Police Officer and United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv02239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
