Cases 31 - 40 of 334
Singh v. Amar et al
as 2:2022cv02252
Plaintiff:
John Doe, Keerut Singh and Keith Singh
Defendant:
Vikram D Amar, Virginia M Vermillion, Verity Winship and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rose Meacham v. University of Illinois, et al
as 22-3061
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSE MEACHAM
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF ILLINOIS, ILLINOIS STATE BAR ASSOCIATION and others
Madukwe v. Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Illinois
as 1:2022cv06194
Plaintiff:
JOY MADUKWE
Defendant:
Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2950
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Doe v. Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
as 2:2022cv02197
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meacham v. University Of Illinois et al
as 1:2022cv04961
Plaintiff:
Rose Meachum and Rose Meacham
Defendant:
University Of Illinois, State of Illinois, Illinois State Bar Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2513
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rahul Malhotra v. University of Illinois at Urbana, et al
as 22-2469
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAHUL MALHORTA and RAHUL MALHOTRA
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA, -CHAMPAIGN, RONY DIE and JOHN DOES, 1-30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03644
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
