Cases 31 - 40 of 71
Safeco Insurance Company of Oregon v. Helen of Troy, L.P. et al
as 6:2015cv02376
Defendant:
Helen of Troy, L.P. and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Safeco Insurance Company of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nakano v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc
as 2:2015cv02346
Plaintiff:
Erla Nakano
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01859
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Unknown:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01505
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Skogstad v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00431
Plaintiff:
Sandra Skogstad
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Stevens v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc et al
as 3:2015cv00243
Defendant:
John Doe 1-100 and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Rowlett et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 6:2015cv00114
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rowlett and Janet Rowlett
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01429
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Salibello et al
as 3:2013cv00385
Plaintiff:
Cosmo Salibello and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
