Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Dennis Ray Lowe v. Warden Hocking Correctional Facility
as 2:2011cv01012
Petitioner:
Dennis Ray Lowe
Respondent:
Warden Hocking Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fanaro v. Warden Hocking Correctional Facility
as 2:2010cv01002
Petitioner:
Carl Fanaro
Respondent:
Warden Hocking Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pilgrim v. Warden Hocking Correctional Facility
as 2:2010cv00761
Petitioner:
Torrance C. Pilgrim
Respondent:
Warden Hocking Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vance v. Warden Hocking Correctional Facility
as 2:2010cv00746
Petitioner:
Lenzzie R. Vance
Respondent:
Warden Hocking Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas Leach, Jr. v. Warden
as 10-3832
Petitioner - Appellant:
THOMAS P. LEACH, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, Hocking Correctional Facility
Smith v. Warden, Hocking Correctional Facility
as 1:2010cv00218
Petitioner:
Larry Smith
Respondent:
Warden, Hocking Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nedea v. Warden, Hocking Correctional Facility
as 1:2010cv00099
Petitioner:
Romulus Louis Nedea
Respondent:
Warden, Hocking Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Freeman v. Warden Hocking Correctional Facility
as 2:2010cv00035
Petitioner:
Richard Bryan Freeman
Respondent:
Warden Hocking Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gibson v. Warden Hocking Correctional Facility
as 1:2010cv00008
Petitioner:
Kenneth W Gibson
Respondent:
Warden Hocking Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Readnour v. Warden, Hocking Correctional Facility
as 1:2010cv00005
Petitioner:
Jack Readnour
Respondent:
Warden, Hocking Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
