Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 355
Burns Paiute Tribe, et al v. Ester McCullough, et al
as 23-15261
Plaintiff: WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, WILDLANDS DEFENSE, GREAT BASIN RESOURCE WATCH and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: BURNS PAIUTE TRIBE, RENO-SPARKS INDIAN COLONY and ATSA KOODAKUH WYH NUWU PEOPLE OF RED MOUNTAIN
Defendant / Appellee: ESTER M. MCCULLOUGH, District Manager, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: LITHIUM NEVADA CORPORATION
Bartell Ranch LLC, et al v. Ester McCullough, et al
as 23-15262
Plaintiff / Appellant: BARTELL RANCH LLC and EDWARD BARTELL
Plaintiff: WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, WILDLANDS DEFENSE, GREAT BASIN RESOURCE WATCH and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: RENO-SPARKS INDIAN COLONY, BURNS PAIUTE TRIBE and ATSA KOODAKUH WYH NUWU PEOPLE OF RED MOUNTAIN
Defendant / Appellee: ESTER M. MCCULLOUGH, District Manager, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: LITHIUM NEVADA CORPORATION
Western Watersheds Project v. U.S. Forest Service
as 1:2023cv00171
Plaintiff: Western Watersheds Project
Defendant: U.S. Forest Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT v. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR et al
as 1:2023cv00283
Plaintiff: WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT
Defendant: UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
WildEarth Guardians, et al v. Kurtis Steele, et al
as 23-35125
Plaintiff / Appellee: WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, a non-profit organization, WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, a non-profit organization, SWAN VIEW COALITION and others
Defendant / Appellant: KURTIS E. STEELE, in his capacity as Forest Supervisor for the Flathead National Forest, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, a federal agency, MARTHA WILLIAMS, in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Director, Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: MONTANA LOGGING ASSOCIATION and AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. Haaland et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00002
Plaintiff: Center for Biological Diversity, Western Watersheds Project and Pat Munday
Defendant: Deb Haaland, Martha Williams and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Wildearth Guardians et al v. Bucknall et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2023cv00010
Plaintiff: Wildearth Guardians, Western Watersheds Project and Trap Free Montana
Defendant: Janet Bucknall, Dalin Tidwell, United States Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Garfield County et al v. Biden et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00059
Plaintiff: Garfield County, Kane County, State of Utah and others
Defendant: Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Deb Haaland, Department of the Interior and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Zebediah George Dalton, BlueRibbon Coalition, Kyle Kimmerle and others
Intervenor Defendant: Navajo Nation, Hopi Tribe, Ute Mountain Ute Tribe and others
Petitioner: National Parks Conservation Association, Wilderness Society, Grand Canyon Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Dalton et al v. Biden et al
as 4:2022cv00060
Plaintiff: Zebediah George Dalton, Blueribbon Coalition, Kyle Kimmerle and others
Defendant: Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Debra A. Haaland, Department of the Interior and others
Petitioner: Navajo Nation, National Parks Conservation Association, Wilderness Society and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0431 Antiquities Act
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT et al v. VILSACK et al
as 1:2022cv00214
Plaintiff: Western Watersheds Project, ROCKY MOUNTAIN WILD and WildEarth Guardians
Defendant: Thomas J Vilsack and United States Forest Service
Intervenor Defendant: State of Wyoming
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?