Cases 31 - 40 of 72
Friends of Alaska National Wildlife Refuges et al v. Bernhardt et al
as 3:2019cv00216
Plaintiff:
Alaska Wilderness League, Friends of Alaska National Wildlife Refuges, National Wildlife Refuge Association and others
Defendant:
David Bernhardt, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and U.S. Department of the Interior
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
WildEarth Guardians et al v. U.S. Forest Service et al
as 1:2019cv00203
Plaintiff:
WildEarth Guardians, Western Watersheds Project and Wilderness Watch
Defendant:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and U.S. Forest Service
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
Wilderness Watch et al v. Ferebee et al
as 1:2019cv01449
Defendant:
Brian Ferebee and United States Forest Service
Plaintiff:
San Juan Citizens Alliance, Great Old Broads for Wilderness and Wilderness Watch
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Friends of Alaska National Wildlife Refuges et al v. Zinke et al
as 3:2018cv00029
Plaintiff:
Friends of Alaska National Wildlife Refuges , The Wilderness Society , National Audubon Society and others
Defendant:
Ryan Zinke, U.S. Department of the Interior and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Wilderness Watch, et al v. Tom Vilsack, et al
as 17-35882
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WILDERNESS WATCH, FRIENDS OF THE CLEARWATER and WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT
Defendant:
TOM VILSACK, U.S. Secretary of Agriculture, TOM TIDWELL, Chief, U.S. Forest Service, NORA RASURE, Regional Forester of Region Four of the U. S. Forest Service and others
Defendant - Appellant:
VIRGIL MOORE, Director, Idaho Department of Fish & Game
Wilderness Watch, et al v. Tom Vilsack, et al
as 17-35878
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WILDERNESS WATCH, FRIENDS OF THE CLEARWATER and WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT
Defendant - Appellant:
TOM VILSACK, U.S. Secretary of Agriculture, TOM TIDWELL, Chief, U.S. Forest Service, NORA RASURE, Regional Forester of Region Four of the U. S. Forest Service and others
State of Alaska, et al v. Ryan Zinke, et al
as 17-35618
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, MITCH ELLIS, in his official capacity as Chief of Refuges for the Alaska Region of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, JIM KURTH, in his official capacity as Acting Director, United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
ALASKA WILDLIFE ALLIANCE, DENALI CITIZENS COUNCIL, WILDERNESS WATCH and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE FOUNDATION, STATE OF ALASKA, GILBERT HUNTINGTON and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
RONALD T. WEST, Proposed Intervenor
State of Alaska, et al v. Ryan Zinke, et al
as 17-35618
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF ALASKA, SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL, ALASKA PROFESSIONAL HUNTERS ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RYAN K. ZINKE, in his official capacity as United States Secretary of the Interior, JIM KURTH, in his official capacity as Acting Director, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, MITCH ELLIS, in his official capacity as Chief of Refuges for the Alaska Region of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
ALASKA WILDLIFE ALLIANCE, ALASKANS FOR WILDLIFE, FRIENDS OF ALASKA NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGES and others
Movant - Appellant:
RONALD T. WEST, Proposed Intervenor
Idaho Conservation League, et al v. Keith Lannom, et al
as 17-35290
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE, THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY, EARTHWORKS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
KEITH B. LANNOM, Forest Supervisor for the Payette National Forest and UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE MINES & MINERALS, LLC
Idaho Conservation League, et al v. Keith Lannom, et al
as 17-35241
Plaintiff - Appellee:
IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE, THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY, EARTHWORKS and others
Defendant - Appellant:
KEITH B. LANNOM, Forest Supervisor for the Payette National Forest and UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE
Intervenor-Defendant:
AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE MINES & MINERALS, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
