Cases 31 - 40 of 233
In Re Attorney Disciplinary Proceedings
as 1:2017mc91377
Movant:
Robert M. Farrell
Respondent:
Michael R. Hugo
Cause Of Action: Referral from BK Court - Attorney Discipline
Barron, DC et al v. NCMIC Insurance Co.
as 1:2017cv11969
Plaintiff:
Philip C Barron, DC , Brian T Farrell, DC and Gilbert S Weiner, DC
Defendant:
NCMIC Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re Attorney Disciplinary Proceedings
as 1:2017mc91314
Movant:
Robert M. Farrell
Respondent:
Howard Ira Wilgoren
Cause Of Action: Referral from BK Court - Attorney Discipline
In Re Attorney Disciplinary Proceedings
as 1:2017mc91313
Movant:
Robert M. Farrell
Respondent:
Anthony V. Zeolla
Cause Of Action: Referral from BK Court - Attorney Discipline
In Re Attorney Disciplinary Proceedings
as 1:2017mc91315
Movant:
Robert M. Farrell
Respondent:
Michael R. Levin
Cause Of Action: Referral from BK Court - Attorney Discipline
In Re Attorney Disciplinary Proceedings
as 1:2017mc91301
Movant:
Robert M. Farrell
Respondent:
John N. Lewis
Cause Of Action: Referral from BK Court - Attorney Discipline
In Re Attorney Disciplinary Proceedings
as 1:2017mc91300
Movant:
Robert M. Farrell
Respondent:
Lawrence R. Mehl
Cause Of Action: Referral from BK Court - Attorney Discipline
In Re Attorney Disciplinary Proceedings
as 1:2017mc91292
Movant:
Robert M. Farrell
Respondent:
Nancy C. Flahive
Cause Of Action: Referral from BK Court - Attorney Discipline
In Re Attorney Disciplinary Proceedings
as 1:2017mc91285
Movant:
Robert M. Farrell
Respondent:
Christopher McHallam
Cause Of Action: Referral from BK Court - Attorney Discipline
Perales v. City and County of San Francisco Sheriff Department et al et al
as 1:2017cv11509
Defendant:
Phil Daigneau, Sandra Hutchens, J. Pecot e.g and others
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
