Cases 31 - 40 of 59
William Thornton v. Euketa Oliver
as 11-56458
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM CECIL THORNTON
Defendant - Appellee:
EUKETA OLIVER, Public Defender
William Thornton v. Kamala Harris, et al
as 11-56459
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM CECIL THORNTON
Defendant - Appellee:
KAMALA HARRIS, Attorney General of California and MATTHEW CATE, Director of CDCR
William Thornton v. Christine Cavalin, et al
as 11-56457
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM CECIL THORNTON
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTINE CAVALIN, CDCR Parole Agent and JOSE CALDERON, CDCR Parole Agent
Thornton v. Stainer et al
as 3:2011cv01892
Petitioner:
William Cecil Thornton
Respondent:
Micheal Stainer , Kamala Harris and Matthew Cate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
William Thornton v. Christine Cavalin, et al
as 11-56358
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM CECIL THORNTON
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTINE CAVALIN, CDCR Parole Agent, MARK JOSEPH, CDCR Parole Agent, JAMES TILTON, Former Director of CDCR and others
William Thornton v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 11-56307
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM CECIL THORNTON
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, Secretary of Corrections, RICHARD HERNANDEZ, Secretary of Corrections, PICATOSTE, Jane Doe, Registered Nurse and others
Thornton v. Cate et al
as 3:2011cv01581
Petitioner:
William Cecil Thornton
Respondent:
Matthew Cate and Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
William Thornton v. Arnold Schwarzeneggar, et al
as 11-56146
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM CECIL THORNTON
Defendant - Appellee:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGAR, Governor of California, MATTHEW CATE, Secretary of Corrections, LEWIS, John Doe, Parole Unit Supervisor and others
Thornton v. Harris et al
as 3:2011cv01525
Plaintiff:
William Cecil Thornton
Defendant:
Kamala Harris and Matthew Cate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thornton v. Harris et al
as 3:2011cv01558
Plaintiff:
William Cecil Thornton
Defendant:
Kamala Harris and Matthew Cate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
