Cases 31 - 40 of 71
JOHNSON et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2014cv04140
Plaintiff:
MAUREEN JOHNSON and WILLIAM D. JOHNSON, SR.
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ETHICON, INC. and ETHICON, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv04939
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Elmore et al v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
as 3:2013cv02089
Plaintiff:
Dolly G. Elmore and William D. Elmore
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RIVERA v. CARTER et al
as 1:2012cv05345
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM D. RIVERA
Defendant:
ROBIN E. CARTER, HUBERT G. GILBERT and DWAYNE BRYANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THE GEORGE LEON FAMILY TRUST v. COLEMAN et al
as 3:2012cv04401
Plaintiff:
THE GEORGE LEON FAMILY TRUST
Defendant:
MARY SUE COLEMAN, PH.D., JAMES G. CULLEN, IAN E.L. DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
CURL et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2012cv04272
Plaintiff:
SUSAN C. CURL and WILLIAM D. CURL
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ETHICON, INC., GYNECARE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. THE PAUL REVERE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2012cv00129
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM D. JOHNSON
Defendant:
THE PAUL REVERE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and UNUM GROUP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SPAMER v. COLEMAN et al
as 3:2011cv05099
Plaintiff:
DONOVAN SPAMER
Defendant:
MARY SUE COLEMAN, PH.D., JAMES G. CULLEN, IAN E.L. DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
THE GEORGE LEON FAMILY TRUST v. COLEMAN et al
as 3:2011cv05084
Plaintiff:
THE GEORGE LEON FAMILY TRUST
Defendant:
MARY SUE COLEMAN, JAMES G. CULLEN, IAN E.L. DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
COPELAND v. PRINCE et al
as 3:2011cv04993
Plaintiff:
M.J. COPELAND and Leslie Katz
Defendant:
CHARLES O. PRINCE, III, ANNE M. MULCAHY, MARY SUE COLEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
