Cases 31 - 40 of 120
Guthrie v. US Government et al
as 9:2017cv80390
Plaintiff:
Randolph H. Guthrie, III
Defendant:
US Government, Apple, Inc., AT&T Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
MURRAY v. WOODALL et al
as 8:2017cv00010
Petitioner:
Jacob Murray
Respondent:
Assistant Warden Woodall, J. J. Reeder, Sargeant Waters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURRAY v. WOODALL et al
as 3:2017cv00012
Plaintiff:
Jacob Murray
Defendant:
Assistant Warden Woodall, J. J. Reeder, Sargeant Waters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURRAY v. WOODALL et al
as 1:2016cv00385
Plaintiff:
JACOB MURRAY
Defendant:
WOODALL, J J REEDER, WATERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamze v. Patten et al
as 3:2016cv01443
Plaintiff:
Abdelaziz Bilal Hamze
Defendant:
John S. Patten, Davis, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. J & J Boca II, LLC et al
as 0:2016cv60982
Plaintiff:
Brian Young
Defendant:
J & J Boca II, LLC and Brandi Levinson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
VALE v. J&J POOL AND BEACH SERVICES INC et al
as 0:2016cv60918
Plaintiff:
AMADO VALE
Defendant:
J&J POOL AND BEACH SERVICES INC and JOSEPH M. POU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Orlando Sun Resort Vacation, Inc. et al
as 6:2016cv00083
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Orlando Sun Resort Vacation, Inc., Natalia A. Stubbs, Orlando Sun Resort & Spa, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. CASA Mexicana Restaurant Inc. et al
as 8:2015cv02717
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
CASA Mexicana Restaurant Inc. and Antelma Cruz
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
J & J Produce, Inc. v. PNL Produce, LLC et al
as 6:2015cv00410
Plaintiff:
J & J Produce, Inc.
Defendant:
PNL Produce, LLC and Paul N. Lazechi
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 0499
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
