Cases 31 - 40 of 112
Oklahoma Procure Management LLC v. Sebelius
as 5:2012cv00680
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma Procure Management LLC
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2345
Buckman & Roach v. Olson et al
as 4:2012cv00269
Plaintiff:
Buckman & Roach
Defendant:
Jamey Olson , Commerce and Industry Insurance Company and United States Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Parsons v. Sebelius et al
as 1:2012cv00441
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Plaintiff:
John Parsons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2345
Precision Therapy Services v. Loretta's Home Health Care Inc et al
as 5:2011cv01317
Plaintiff:
Precision Therapy Services
Defendant:
Loretta's Home Health Care Inc
Garnishee:
Palmetto GBA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
AllCare Hospice, Inc. v. Sebelius
as 6:2011cv00365
Plaintiff:
AllCare Hospice, Inc.
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Barnes v. United States Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
as 5:2011cv00885
Plaintiff:
Ruth Joyce Barnes
Defendant:
United States Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2651
Torres v Sebelius
as 1:2011cv00636
Plaintiff:
Gina B Torres
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2345
Brune et al v. United States Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
as 5:2011cv00706
Plaintiff:
Connie Brune
Defendant:
United States Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2345
Wills, et al v. Regence Bluecross Blueshield
as 11-4070
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JORDANN WILLS and MYRON WILLS
Defendant - Appellee:
REGENCE BLUECROSS BLUESHIELD OF UTAH
Tri-County Hospice, Inc. v. Sebeliu
as 11-7017
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRI-COUNTY HOSPICE, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
