Cases 31 - 40 of 5,391
Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al v. MIM Software Inc.
as 1:2024cv10437
Plaintiff:
Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and EXINI Diagnostics AB
Defendant:
MIM Software Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv10480
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv10483
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Watson Guide IP, LLC et al v. 3D Diagnostix, Inc.
as 1:2024cv10518
Plaintiff:
Watson Guide IP, LLC and GuidedSmile, LLC
Defendant:
3D Diagnostix, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
WEX INC v. HP INC et al
as 2:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
WEX INC
Defendant:
HP INC and HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Mundo Natural Inc. v. Intenergy LLC et al
as 3:2024cv01175
Plaintiff:
Mundo Natural Inc.
Defendant:
Intenergy LLC, Jane Doe, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Barrier Guard Technologies, LLC v. Kent Stainless Ltd.
as 1:2024cv10934
Plaintiff:
Barrier Guard Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Kent Stainless Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Christian Dior Couture, SA v. Cafe Dior, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv30052
Plaintiff:
Christian Dior Couture, SA
Defendant:
Cafe Dior, LLC and Gissel Santiago
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Broden v. Private Business Jets, LLC
as 1:2024cv10880
Plaintiff:
Frederik Broden
Defendant:
Private Business Jets, L.L.C. doing business as FlyPrivate
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
OTTO Archive LLC v. Byrne
as 1:2024cv10892
Plaintiff:
OTTO Archive LLC
Defendant:
Michael Byrne
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
