Cases 31 - 40 of 3,609
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
The Mississippi Bar v. Russell
as 3:2024ad00001
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
Rhett R. Russell
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Porfi Stokes, Patricia Green and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Cassidy v. Trans Union LLC
as 1:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Robert Shane Cassidy
Defendant:
Trans Union LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hirschler et al v. Brochard et al
as 1:2023cv00374
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Hirschler and Sherry Rae Hirschler
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Brochard, Nona E. Brochard and Doe 1, Doe 2 and Doe 3
Counter Claimant:
Joe Langlinais
Cross Defendant:
PHH Mortgage Corporation and Halliday Watkins & Mann, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Thompson v. Trustmark National Bank
as 2:2023cv00200
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Andrew Thompson
Defendant:
Trustmark National Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
