Supplemental Security Income Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 9,527
BABB v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00094
Plaintiff: CHE R. BABB
Defendant: MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MEADOWS v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2024cv00059
Plaintiff: CAMERON S. MEADOWS
Defendant: MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Skurat v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00777
Plaintiff: Jodie Skurat
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Wendt v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02138
Plaintiff: RICHARD WENDT
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
STEPHENSON v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00088
Plaintiff: CHARLES E. STEPHENSON
Defendant: MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Moore v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv03062
Plaintiff: Tracey L Moore
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Toolooze v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv04046
Plaintiff: Aaron Toolooze
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
HARDEN v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00451
Plaintiff: JOSEPH R. HARDEN
Defendant: MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Dominguez v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01942
Plaintiff: Byran I. Dominguez
Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
MINGS v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00421
Plaintiff: REBECCA J. MINGS
Defendant: MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?