Cases 41 - 50 of 54,733
Barbera v. Kate Bedrick PR, LLC
as 2:2024cv03505
Plaintiff:
Robert Barbera
Defendant:
Kate Bedrick PR, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
McGucken v. Lenovo (United States) Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03529
Plaintiff:
Dr. Elliot McGucken
Defendant:
Lenovo (United States) Inc., Newegg Inc., HP Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
MARS Advertising, Inc. v. XMars Corp. et al
as 2:2024cv03475
Plaintiff:
MARS Advertising, Inc. d/b/a The Mars Agency
Defendant:
XMars Corp. d/b/a XMars, Inc., SparkX Global Corp. and SparkX Marketing Co., Limited
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Strom v. Petershagen
as 2:2024cv00583
Plaintiff:
Casey Strom
Defendant:
Gary Petershagen
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504 Copyright Infringement
Deborah K. Wong v. Cosmetic Town Inc
as 2:2024cv03442
Plaintiff:
Deborah K. Wong
Defendant:
Cosmetic Town Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Zhang et al v. Google LLC et al
as 3:2024cv02531
Plaintiff:
Jingna Zhang, Sarah Andersen, Hope Larson and others
Defendant:
Google LLC and Alphabet Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Estech Systems IP, LLC v. Zoom Video Communications, Inc.
as 3:2024cv02528
Plaintiff:
Estech Systems IP, LLC
Defendant:
Zoom Video Communications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Estech Systems IP, LLC v. 8X8, Inc.
as 3:2024cv02522
Plaintiff:
Estech Systems IP, LLC
Defendant:
8X8, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Estech Systems IP, LLC v. Dialpad, Inc.
as 3:2024cv02524
Plaintiff:
Estech Systems IP, LLC
Defendant:
Dialpad, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Estech Systems IP, LLC v. Zultys, Inc.
as 3:2024cv02529
Plaintiff:
Estech Systems IP, LLC
Defendant:
Zultys, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
