Cases 41 - 50 of 55,896
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00723
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00728
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Chin v. Small Business Administration of the United States et al
as 3:2024cv00732
Plaintiff:
Sherry Chin
Defendant:
Small Business Administration of the United States, Tammie Polk and Zachary Bradford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 w Fed. Question: Wrongful Termination of Employment
Perfect Point EDM Corporation v. Scintam Engineering LTD
as 3:2024cv00725
Plaintiff:
Perfect Point EDM Corporation
Defendant:
Scintam Engineering LTD
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement
Amersi v. Sheridan et al
as 3:2024cv00726
Plaintiff:
Amin Amersi
Defendant:
John F Sheridan, Leigh A Vosseller, Brian B Hansen and others
Dacones v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00727
Plaintiff:
Gidget Verna Dacones
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7405 IRS: Action for recovery of refunds erroneously made
Sims v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00730
Plaintiff:
Ray P. Sims
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7405 IRS: Action for recovery of refunds erroneously made
Liang et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 3:2024cv00724
Plaintiff:
Jiacheng Liang and Xiya Shi
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou and Attorney General Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act - Right of Review
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC et al v. John Doe
as 3:2024cv00735
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 3:2024cv00737
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement (definitions)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
