Cases 41 - 50 of 59,592
Graham v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2024cv00790
Plaintiff:
Sankona Graham
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Jeremy Bean, Brandon Silber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Bean et al
as 2:2024cv00789
Petitioner:
Edmond Paul Price
Respondent:
Jeremy Bean and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilkins v. Clifford, et al.
as 2:2024cv00792
Petitioner:
Robert Wilkins
Respondent:
Ada County Sheriff Matthew Clifford, Attorney General Raul R. Labrador and Steve Wolfson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Nevius v. Nevada Dept. of Corrections
as 2:2024cv00795
Plaintiff:
Thomas S. Nevius
Defendant:
Nevada Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00793
Plaintiff:
Will Watkins, III
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Funtila v. Casey et al
as 2:2024cv00776
Plaintiff:
Michael Funtila
Defendant:
Alicia Casey and James Grant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00773
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Moore v. Oliver et al
as 2:2024cv00774
Petitioner:
James Lamont Moore
Respondent:
Warden Oliver and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McKinney v. Bean et al
as 2:2024cv00775
Plaintiff:
Anthony McKinney
Defendant:
Jeremy Bean, Dr. Avrom, Medical Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kim v. Wesolowski et al
as 2:2024cv00785
Plaintiff:
Deborah Kim
Defendant:
Brendon Wesolowski and Emerson Automation Solutions
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
