Cases 41 - 50 of 440,784
Hernandez et al v. Berntsen
as 1:2024cv04251
Plaintiff:
Victor Hernandez and Pizza Network International Inc
Defendant:
John Berntsen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
GREEN v. Great Neck Park District et al
as 2:2024cv04246
Plaintiff:
KIM GREEN
Defendant:
Great Neck Park District and Town Of North Hempstead
Seidman v. Airpath Engineering, DPC
as 2:2024cv04239
Plaintiff:
Helayne Seidman
Defendant:
Airpath Engineering, DPC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Tiger Tool International Incorporated v. Le
as 1:2024cv04241
Plaintiff:
Tiger Tool International Incorporated
Defendant:
Yin Le
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Papandrea v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv04242
Plaintiff:
John Papandrea
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bonano Monge v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00562
Plaintiff:
Angel Armando Bonano Monge
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Royal Business Group, LLC v. The Royal Group D LLC D/B/A Royal Group D et al
as 6:2024cv06372
Plaintiff:
Royal Business Group, LLC
Defendant:
The Royal Group D LLC D/B/A Royal Group D and Allen Bloom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Ghani v. Town of West Seneca et al
as 1:2024cv00568
Plaintiff:
Danielle Ghani
Defendant:
Town of West Seneca, Anthony Andolina and Tyler Bebak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00565
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Andres Jr v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00566
Plaintiff:
Richard Allen Andres Jr
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
