Cases 41 - 50 of 140
TOSEAFA v. REGAL LIMOUSINE OF WASHINGTON DC, INC. et al
as 1:2013cv01724
Plaintiff:
CARLOS ISAAC TOSEAFA
Defendant:
REGAL LIMOUSINE OF WASHINGTON DC, INC. and HABIB A KHAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
CURETON v. SARIS et al
as 1:2013cv01516
Plaintiff:
TERRY E. CURETON
Defendant:
PATTI B. SARIS, WILLIAM B. CARR, JR., KETANJI BROWN JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CURETON v. SARIS et al
as 1:2013cv01519
Plaintiff:
TERRY E. CURETON
Defendant:
PATTI B. SARIS, WILLIAM B. CARR, JR., KETANJI B. JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLEY v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2013cv01515
Petitioner:
RONNIE LAMONT COLEY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and ISAAC FULWOOD, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MORRIS v. FAUST et al
as 1:2013cv01404
Petitioner:
STEPHEN LLOYD MORRIS
Respondent:
ISAAC FULWOOD, JR. and THOMAS N. FAUST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WORTHAM v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2013cv01385
Plaintiff:
RONALD WORTHAM
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, ISAAC FULWOOD, JR., STEPHEN HUSK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ISAAC v. SAMUEL
as 1:2013cv01381
Plaintiff:
PRINCE ISAAC
Defendant:
CHARLES SAMUEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COPLIN v. UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION et al
as 1:2013cv01360
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY COPLIN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION, PATTI B. SARIS, KETANJI BROWN JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2013cv01127
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ROY JOHNSON
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ISAAC FULWOOD, JR. and JOHN A. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORGAN v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, ET AL.
as 1:2013cv00864
Plaintiff:
DUJUAN MORGAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and ISAAC FULWOOD, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
