Cases 41 - 50 of 10,342
State of Illinois v. Campbell
as 1:2024cv03979
Plaintiff:
State of Illinois
Defendant:
Keyona M Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Castillo-lara v. King et al
as 3:2024cv01274
Plaintiff:
Lynda M. Castillo-Lara
Defendant:
Maisie King and Aaron Wise
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hamid v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv03913
Plaintiff:
Huma Hamid
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, UR M JADDOU, Acting District Dir. Mark HANSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03928
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03934
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jones v. Keehma et al
as 1:2024cv03929
Plaintiff:
Jason M. Jones
Defendant:
Jason Keehma and Shorewood Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03834
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
J-M Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Simons Hanly Conroy, LLP et al
as 1:2024cv03853
Plaintiff:
J-M Manufacturing Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Simons Hanly Conroy, LLP, Nicholas Angelides, Perry Browder and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Allison v. Neal et al
as 3:2024cv01258
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Allison
Defendant:
James M. Neal, Tyler J. Griffin, City of Bridgeport, IL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
SANCHEZ LIVIA v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv03810
Plaintiff:
LISBET SANCHEZ LIVIA
Defendant:
Alejandro N. Mayorkas, DIRECTOR OF USCIS UR M JADDOU, TED H. KIM and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
