Cases 41 - 50 of 221
Principle Life Insurance v. Nava et al
as 1:2021cv00091
Plaintiff:
Principle Life Insurance
Defendant:
T. G. 2, Rhonda Garibay, Maria Nava and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Real Ketones v. Does 1-10
as 2:2021cv00194
Defendant:
John Does 1-10
Plaintiff:
Real Ketones
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00143
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00802
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
1-800 Contacts, Inc. v. Webeyecare
as 2:2020cv00689
Defendant:
Webeyecare
Plaintiff:
1-800 Contacts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Alcon Vision v. Lens.com, Inc et al
as 2:2020mc00639
Plaintiff:
Alcon Vision
Defendant:
Lens.com,Inc
Respondent:
1-800 Contacts, Inc.
Counter Defendant:
Novartis AG
Portoli Investments et al v. Norcap Holdings et al
as 2:2020cv00517
Plaintiff:
BYM, Kish North, Benjamin J. Chapman and others
Defendant:
Nicholas Legamaro, Norcap Holdings and Eric Sage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01004
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
3Rd Party Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Kenney v. Does 1-20
as 2:2019cv00882
Defendant:
John Does 1-20, Christopher Kim Kay an individual doing business as Blue Global Media, Blue Global LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Karissa Kenney
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
