Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 41 - 50 of 58
CHOI v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2016cv00747
Plaintiff: CHANG CHOI
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
XIAO v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2016cv00074
Plaintiff: CHANG XIAO
Defendant: JEH CHARLES JOHNSON , LEON RODRIGUEZ , KATHY A. BARAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
ORTIZ MELGAR v. LOUYANS, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv01679
Plaintiff: JOSE REYNALDO ORTIZ MELGAR
Defendant: LOUYANS, INC. and ANDY CHANG
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
DUBON RAMIREZ v. LOUYANS, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv00832
Plaintiff: FRANKLIN ADONAY DUBON RAMIREZ
Defendant: LOUYANS, INC. and ANDY CHANG
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
IN RE: SUBPOENA MATTER IN
as 1:2015mc00379
Plaintiff: PETER CHANG
Defendant: DUNES FUND, LLC
NADON v. CHANG et al
as 1:2013cv01206
Plaintiff: GLORIA NADON
Defendant: THOMAS CHANG and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01110
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MATERIAS PRIMAS SECUNDARIAS, S.A. v. MEGA COMPANY et al
as 1:2013cv01024
Defendant: MEGA COMPANY , CHANG OH TURKMANI and BEAUMONT INVESTMENTS, LTD.
Plaintiff: MATERIAS PRIMAS SECUNDARIAS, S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
ROBINSON v. CAS 4000 KANSAS LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00740
Defendant: CAS 4000 KANSAS LLC and CHANGE ALL SOULS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Plaintiff: ALEXANDER N. ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
DYDZAK v. SCHWARZENEGGER et al
as 1:2012cv01534
Plaintiff: DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK
Defendant: ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, MARIA SHRIVER, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?