Cases 41 - 50 of 1,174
Spencer v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
as 3:2023cv00569
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline E. Spencer
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Whitaker v. Steward et al
as 2:2023cv00581
Plaintiff:
Stephen Whitaker
Defendant:
Heidi Steward, Steve Robbins, Bob Culp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ogan v. Newport Cafe et al
as 6:2023cv00452
Plaintiff:
Ryan E. Ogan
Defendant:
Newport Cafe and David See
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jokinen v. Oregon Department of Corrections
as 2:2023cv00161
Plaintiff:
Dylan Aaron Jokinen
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Superintendent J. Miller, SGT M. Dinucci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Malmsheimer, et al v. FCA, US, LLC
as 3:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
Matthew E. Malmsheimer and Elizabeth W. Malmsheimer
Defendant:
FCA, US, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Hootman v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
Andrew J. E. Hootman
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Gerwald v. USA
as 6:2023cv00382
Plaintiff:
Anaissa B. Gerwald and Ann E. Meraw
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McNamer v. Future Motion, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00460
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. McNamer
Defendant:
Future Motion, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Spackman v. Hood et al
as 2:2023cv00359
Plaintiff:
Bobby Allen Spackman
Defendant:
Sgt. E. Hood, 15 Unnamed Corr. Officers and Lt. S. Houston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
