Cases 41 - 50 of 323
Morris v. Long et al
as 1:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
Scott Patrick Morris
Defendant:
Ryan Long, Ramona Avant, Paul Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Long
as 1:2023cv00202
Petitioner:
Robert Dixon
Respondent:
Jeffey Long
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morris v. Long et al
as 1:2023cv00205
Plaintiff:
Scott Patrick Morris
Defendant:
Ryan Long, Paul Patterson, Joshua Bender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrett v. Long et al
as 1:2023cv00136
Petitioner:
Shane Erik Garrett
Defendant:
Jeff Long
Respondent:
Dean Williams and Phil Weiser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cordova v. Kautz et al
as 1:2023cv00081
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Cordova
Defendant:
Trisha Kautz, T. J. Rittenhouse, Vickie Nira and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fellows et al v. Williams et al
as 1:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
Charles Fellows and Justin Sturtevant
Defendant:
Dean Williams, Ryan Long, Frederick Currier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alcalde v. Long et al
as 1:2022cv03353
Petitioner:
Diego Olmos Alcalde
Respondent:
Jeff Long, Dean Williams and Phil Weiser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Damon v. Long
as 1:2022cv03266
Petitioner:
Lauran Mina Damon
Respondent:
Ryan Long
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Brady et al
as 1:2022cv03216
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
Judge Jill Brady, Jessica Aggson, David Chapin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Vasquez et al
as 1:2022cv03080
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
Vasquez, Jackson, Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
