Cases 41 - 50 of 328
Long et al v. Andlinger
as 1:2023cv00742
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Long and John Prizant a sole proprietorship doing business as Generational Solutions
Defendant:
Jeanne Andlinger
Counter Defendant:
John Prizant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Bertolo v. William et al
as 1:2023cv00713
Petitioner:
James M. Bertolo
Respondent:
Dean William, Jeff Long and JR Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Story v. Bingham et al
as 1:2023cv00632
Plaintiff:
Alan R. Story
Defendant:
Scot Bingham, Kari Long Dworkin and Matt Hardin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. Long et al
as 1:2023cv00291
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Pittman
Defendant:
Jeff Long, Roland Jackson, Landee Zanotelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Central Telecom Long Distance, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00259
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Central Telecom Long Distance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0252 - Telecommunications Act
Morris v. Long et al
as 1:2023cv00205
Plaintiff:
Scott Patrick Morris
Defendant:
Ryan Long, Paul Patterson, Joshua Bender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Long et al
as 1:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
Scott Patrick Morris
Defendant:
Ryan Long, Ramona Avant, Paul Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Long
as 1:2023cv00202
Petitioner:
Robert Dixon
Respondent:
Jeffey Long
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garrett v. Long et al
as 1:2023cv00136
Petitioner:
Shane Erik Garrett
Defendant:
Jeff Long
Respondent:
Dean Williams and Phil Weiser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cordova v. Kautz et al
as 1:2023cv00081
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Cordova
Defendant:
Trisha Kautz, T. J. Rittenhouse, Vickie Nira and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
