Cases 41 - 50 of 528
Mitchell v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01100
Plaintiff:
Shannon Mitchell
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Husband v. Chamber-Smith et al
as 1:2023cv00170
Plaintiff:
Louis R. Husband
Defendant:
Annette Chamber-Smith and Warden Wanza Jackson-Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01069
Plaintiff:
Delilah Mitchell
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Allen v. Jackson-Mitchell
as 3:2023cv00394
Petitioner:
Jamaree Allen
Respondent:
Warden Wanza Jackson-Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 2:2023cv00156
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe, Aramark Correctional Services and others
Plaintiff:
Lance King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burke v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 2:2022cv04421
Defendant:
Jane/John Doe, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Norman Burke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Woods v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 2:2022cv04420
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, Aramark Correctional Services and others
Plaintiff:
Franklin Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maye v. Corrections Center of Northeast Ohio, et al.
as 3:2022cv02176
Plaintiff:
Ricco L Maye
Defendant:
Craig Eiden, Masser, Kevin Bloom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maye v. Eiden et al
as 2:2022cv04249
Plaintiff:
Ricco L Maye
Defendant:
Craig Eiden, Masser, Kevin Bloom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. WesBanco Bank, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00314
Plaintiff:
John W. Mitchell
Defendant:
WesBanco Bank, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
