Cases 41 - 50 of 63
MASELLA et al v. ACME MARKETS, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv06300
Plaintiff:
VICTOR MASELLA, SR. and MARY MASELLA
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC. and SUPERVALU, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH et al v. SUPERVALU, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv05945
Plaintiff:
MARY SMITH and JIMMY SMITH
Defendant:
SUPERVALU, INC. and ACME MARKETS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARCONI v. ACME MARKETS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv03847
Plaintiff:
BRUCE MARCONI
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC. , 10TH AND REED ACME MARKET, INC. and SUPERVALU, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JANITS v. ACME MARKETS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv03482
Plaintiff:
JOY ANN JANITS
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC. , ALBERTSONS, INC. and SUPERVALU, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FARINA v. ACME MARKETS, INC.
as 2:2010cv02914
Plaintiff:
MARCUS FARINA
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00925
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00895
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
TOUHILL et al v. SUPER VALU, INC. et al
as 5:2010cv00145
Plaintiff:
DENISE TOUHILL and BILL TOUHILL
Defendant:
SUPER VALU, INC., ACME MARKET, ACME MARKET, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv04683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
BOBADILLA et al v. ACME MARKETS, INC.
as 2:2009cv01295
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH BOBADILLA and KATHLEEN BOBADILLA
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
