Cases 41 - 50 of 136
Mychael T Shannon v. Edward S Alamedia
as 5:2003cv00375
Respondent:
Edward S Alameida, -
Petitioner:
Mychael Tyrone Shannon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bryan Ransom v. M. Johnson, et al
as 10-17591
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRYAN EDWIN RANSOM
Defendant - Appellee:
M. JOHNSON, P. FLORES, D. ADAMS and others
Frank Benson v. Edward Alameida, Jr., et al
as 10-17528
Petitioner - Appellant:
FRANK KENNETH BENSON
Respondent - Appellee:
EDWARD S. ALAMEIDA, Jr., CALIFORNIA BOARD OF PRISON TERMS, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Glenn L. Boyd Jr. v. Domingo Uribe Jr.
as 5:2010cv01648
Defendant:
Alameida, R Allen, S Barringer and others
Petitioner:
Glenn L Boyd, Jr.
Respondent:
Domingo Uribe, Jr.
Jack Koch v. Edward Alameida, Jr., et al
as 10-55697
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACK R. KOCH
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWARD S. ALAMEIDA, Jr., Director of C.D.C., SKELTON, Correctional Officer, MALDONADO, Correctional Officer and others
Todd Ashker, et al v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 10-15911
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TODD LEWIS ASHKER and DANNY TROXELL
Defendant - Appellee:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, R. Q. HICKMAN, EDWARD J. ALAMEIDA, Jr. and others
Arthur Van Swait v. USDCLA
as 10-71111
:
In re: ARTHUR VAN SWAIT
Petitioner:
ARTHUR VAN SWAIT
Respondent:
USDC, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
EDWARD ALAMEIDA
Saffold v. Giles et al (INMATE1)
as 1:2007cv00598
Respondent:
Edward S Alameida, Jr and Randolph L Candelaria
Petitioner:
Tommy Naylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Jeffrey Williams v. A Santa Cruz, et al
as 10-15628
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY ALLEN WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
A SANTA CRUZ, DERREL ADAMS and EDWARD S. ALAMEIDA, Jr.
Fernando Guizar v. Jeanne Woodford, et al
as 10-15570
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FERNANDO GUIZAR
Defendant - Appellee:
JEANNE S. WOODFORD, E. ALAMEIDA, Jr., G. HARRIS and others
Defendant:
S C WOHLEND, V C BASSO, S. JAMES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
