Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Donna Kruenegel et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv01822
Plaintiff:
Darlene Anderson, Girtha Ashford, Irene Bartley and others
Defendant:
Does, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer, Inc.
TCA Global Credit Master Fund, L.P. v. Jeffrey Burton et al
as 2:2013mc00361
Defendant:
24-7 Press, Inc., Ashford Publishing, Inc., Ashford Radio, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
TCA Global Credit Master Fund, L.P.
Ashford v. Valenzuela et al
as 3:2013cv01806
Petitioner:
Burk N. Ashford
Respondent:
E. Valenzuela and Kamala D. Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ashford v. Virga
as 2:2013cv00178
Petitioner:
Gerald Arnold Ashford
Respondent:
Tim Virga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robert Kaufman Co Inc v. Ashford Textiles LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00156
Defendant:
Ashford Textiles LLC and John Does
Plaintiff:
Robert Kaufman Co Inc
Ashford et al v. Atmajian, M.D.
as 1:2012cv00628
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Ashford , Patricia Barbala, M.D. , Cathryn Foronda and others
Defendant:
Timothy K. Atmajian, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ashford v. People of the State of California
as 2:2011cv01423
Petitioner:
Laurence Edwin Ashford
Defendant:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Arvind Ashford Sinha et al v. US Bank National Association et al
as 2:2011cv02943
Defendant:
Does, Quality Loan Service Corporation and US Bank National Association
Plaintiff:
Arvind Ashford Sinha and Kimberlie Sinha
Guzman v. Bridgepoint Education, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00069
Plaintiff:
Betty Guzman
Defendant:
Bridgepoint Education, Inc. , Ashford University and University of the Rockies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rosendahl et al v. Bridgepoint Education, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00061
Plaintiff:
Scott Rosendahl and Veronica Clark
Defendant:
Bridgepoint Education, Inc. , Ashford University and University of the Rockies
Miscellaneous_party:
Betty Guzman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
