Cases 41 - 50 of 466
Redden v. Black et al
as 1:2022cv00694
Plaintiff:
James F. Redden
Defendant:
Warden Kenneth Black and Attorney General of the State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00733
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01865
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Giwa v. U.S. Attorney General
as 1:2022cv00691
Plaintiff:
Olamide Halimah Giwa
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Grater v. Damascus Township Trustees
as 3:2022cv00318
Plaintiff:
Charles Grater
Defendant:
Damascus Township Trustees and Bates Recycling, Inc.
Interested Party:
Dave Yost Ohio Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00321
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Justice v. State of Ohio et al
as 2:2021cv05903
Plaintiff:
Lotus Justice
Defendant:
State of Ohio, Attorney General, State of Ohio, Bureau of Criminal Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
