Cases 41 - 50 of 60
Culver et al v. United Commerce Centers Inc et al
as 3:2016cv01055
Plaintiff:
Steve Wesley Culver and Cassie Charlene Culver
Defendant:
United Commerce Centers Inc , New World International Inc and National Auto Parts Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Kobace LLC v. U.S. Auto Parts Network, Inc.
as 6:2016cv00299
Plaintiff:
Kobace LLC
Defendant:
U.S. Auto Parts Network, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Oberalis LLC v. U.S. Auto Parts Network, Inc.
as 2:2015cv01073
Plaintiff:
Oberalis LLC
Defendant:
U.S. Auto Parts Network, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
New World International Inc et al v. Ford Global Technologies LLC
as 3:2015cv01121
Plaintiff:
New World International Inc and National Auto Parts Inc
Defendant:
Ford Global Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Qommerce Systems, LLC v. U.S. Auto Parts Network, Inc.
as 6:2015cv00187
Plaintiff:
Qommerce Systems, LLC
Defendant:
U.S. Auto Parts Network, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
VideoSqope, LLC v. Advance Stores Company, Inc. dba Advance Auto Parts, Inc.
as 6:2015cv00085
Plaintiff:
VideoSqope, LLC
Defendant:
Advance Stores Company, Inc. dba Advance Auto Parts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Geihsler et al v. Parts Warehouse Inc
as 3:2015cv00240
Plaintiff:
Mark Geihsler and Classic Auto Parts Inc
Defendant:
Parts Warehouse Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Still v. Midwest Can Company et al
as 2:2014cv01015
Plaintiff:
Oscar W Still
Defendant:
Midwest Can Company, Container Specialties, Inc. and O'Reilly Auto Parts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
eDekka LLC v. U.S. Auto Parts Network, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00318
Plaintiff:
eDekka LLC
Defendant:
U.S. Auto Parts Network, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Ruiz v. Martinez et al
as 1:2013cv00224
Plaintiff:
Anita Martinez Ruiz
Defendant:
Christopher Lee Martinez, Advance Auto Parts, Inc. and ARI Fleet, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
